|
|
Post by lernerimplants on Dec 20, 2012 14:13:14 GMT -5
OK
this is an over-denture case where there was an economic inability to proceed with a fixed case. This was sent in by Dr. Paresh Patel of North Carolina
|
|
|
|
Post by lernerimplants on Dec 20, 2012 14:16:56 GMT -5
preop Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by lernerimplants on Dec 20, 2012 14:17:36 GMT -5
clinical Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by lernerimplants on Dec 20, 2012 14:18:48 GMT -5
surgery Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by lernerimplants on Dec 20, 2012 14:31:35 GMT -5
pan pot Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by lernerimplants on Dec 20, 2012 14:32:09 GMT -5
ct pot Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by lernerimplants on Dec 20, 2012 14:32:58 GMT -5
pickup of bsb over-denture attachments Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by lernerimplants on Dec 20, 2012 14:33:40 GMT -5
palate free overdenture Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by lernerimplants on Dec 20, 2012 14:38:01 GMT -5
I guess if the bone damage on the right canine region was not so significant the right side could have had a better anterior distrubution.
One question that we should always be aware of is the change of lingual thickness of the denture by having an attachment in the anterior where speech is developed ina patient with unresolved loss of vertical dimension or buccal flange projection of the attachment which might affect cosmetics if the implant was placed buccaly in an area without significant interdental distance and where the flange is narrow and thickness of denture is not adequate to prevent attachment show through.
nice case
Best
Sheldon
|
|
